iGBA
sailing

Not just keywords: Sweeps and prediction markets SEO in 2026

09 JUN 2026
Milan Novakovic HIREQUARTERS

By

Milan

Novakovic

As sweepstakes slow in the US, prediction markets are emerging rapidly as a new monetisation channel for affiliates – but both are under regulatory pressure. SEO specialist and HIREQUARTERS founder, Milan Novakovic, explores the market environments surrounding the two verticals in 2026 and why the right keywords matter more than just search visibility.

Sweepstakes casinos and prediction markets, two of the fastest-growing gaming-adjacent categories in the US, are navigating regulatory storms at the same time, and the keyword decisions affiliates make right now will determine which ones come out the other side with durable traffic and which ones get caught in the crossfire.

These regulatory modifications are not simply a shift in traffic opportunities. They represent a fundamental change in how affiliates should think about keyword portfolios, content risk and long-term search strategy.

Sweepstakes casinos are facing an accelerating state-by-state crackdown. By early 2026, multiple jurisdictions had banned sweepstakes casinos, including California, New York, Connecticut, Montana, Nevada and New Jersey, joining Idaho, Michigan, Washington and a few other states that had previously restricted this vertical.

The crackdown has reduced the number of available operators and software providers, but it has also altered the affiliate strategy.

In previous years, affiliates treated geo-targeted sweepstakes pages as straightforward acquisition assets. Rankings for terms such as "best sweepstakes casinos in California" or "New York sweepstakes casino bonus" could generate predictable revenue for years. That assumption no longer holds.

A page may continue to rank and generate impressions, but the monetisation infrastructure behind it no longer exists.

While some states have only banned operators and moved on, others have been more diligent in restricting the whole ecosystem around them.

California's AB 831 is particularly significant because it broadened enforcement beyond the operators themselves. In practice, this means that affiliates who continue promoting prohibited sweepstakes sites to California users are now directly within the scope of the state's enforcement framework.

Even where direct liability is not the primary concern, commercial reality is difficult to ignore. As operators exit regulated markets, affiliate programmes fizzle out, and tracking links disappear. A page may continue to rank and generate impressions, but the monetisation infrastructure behind it no longer exists.

For many affiliates, the priority is, therefore, not growth, but the urgency to adjust their portfolios.

State-specific sweepstakes content targeting banned jurisdictions should be audited ASAP. Some pages may even warrant complete removal. Others can be redirected or retained as informational resources, but only if updated to reflect the current legal status. What no longer works is treating every legacy sweepstakes ranking as an asset worth preserving.

The legislative direction is also worth keeping in mind. States are banning, not legalising, so contraction rather than expansion is now the broader trend. As additional state proposals continue to emerge, making forward-looking claims about the long-term stability of the sweepstakes model is becoming increasingly more difficult to justify.

As additional state proposals continue to emerge, making forward-looking claims about the long-term stability of the sweepstakes model is becoming increasingly more difficult to justify

Prediction markets: A different opportunity 

Prediction markets present almost the opposite dynamic compared to sweepstakes casinos. The category remains legally contested, and it’s still early to make any significant strategy shifts from an affiliate perspective. The keyword competition profile appears more similar to what sweepstakes casino content looked like around five years ago.

While a lot of established gaming affiliates have entered the space, much of the current SERP landscape for prediction market queries is still dominated by financial publishers and crypto-focused websites. Of course, this gap won’t last indefinitely, but it’s worth keeping in mind.

Growth figures show how rapidly things have escalated within the vertical. With total trading volume in prediction markets exceeding $44 billion during 2025, Kalshi alone grew more than 1,100% year-on-year. Meanwhile, CFTC-regulated designated contract markets certified more than 1,600 event contracts during the year, a stark contrast to the annual average measured in single digits across much of the previous decade.

Users first want to understand how election contracts work or how Federal Reserve event contracts settle. Commercial intent arrives later

For affiliates, that growth matters because search demand typically follows product supply.

Every new contract category creates informational search behaviour before it creates commercial search behaviour. Users first want to understand how election contracts work or how Federal Reserve event contracts settle. Commercial intent arrives later.

That brings about an unusually attractive entry point for content-led affiliates. Rather than competing immediately for highly commercial terms, publishers can build topical authority around emerging event categories while keyword competition remains relatively low.

Prediction markets also operate on a much faster content cycle than traditional sports betting or casino verticals do. Search demand is often tied to specific events, whether that’s presidential elections or a currently hot geopolitical event. 

Once an event resolves, interest quickly shifts to the next market, and that dynamic rewards affiliates who build content calendars around newly launched contracts rather than relying solely on evergreen comparison pages. 

Therefore, monitoring new contract approvals and emerging market categories can provide an early signal of future search demand, allowing affiliates to publish content before competition intensifies.

Monitoring new contract approvals and emerging market categories can provide an early signal of future search demand, allowing affiliates to publish content before competition intensifies

Why language matters more than ever

Terminology itself has become part of the regulatory debate for both sweepstakes casinos and prediction markets. 

While state attorneys general and lawmakers continue to argue that prediction markets are functionally equivalent to sports betting, licensed platforms and the CFTC maintain that they operate under a federally regulated derivatives framework.

One way that distinction can be justified is through using adjusted language and avoiding familiar gambling terminology. "Wagers", "odds" and "payouts" are stripped from the affiliate dictionary and replaced with alternative terms like "buying contracts", "taking positions" and "trading". 

Similar adjustments can be seen in the sweepstakes vertical, where "purchases and redemptions" have replaced "deposits and withdrawals", with no mentions of "bets" or "wagers".

Affiliates who understand the language distinction can produce content that better matches how the category is evolving, while avoiding the tendency to force prediction markets and sweepstakes platforms into traditional sportsbook and casino narratives.

Sweepstakes affiliates now also need to tackle algorithmic pressure against the content that appears outdated, commercially unsupported or insufficiently authoritative

Mounting pressure from Google 

The timing of the regulatory crackdown coincides with Google's increasingly aggressive quality standards. 

The latest Core Update, rolled out on May 21 and lasting for 11 days, 21 hours, followed the launch of Google I/O 2026, where the company unveiled what it described as one of the biggest transformations of Search in decades, including expanded AI-powered experiences. This direction feels familiar. Google continues to reward expertise, authority and genuinely useful content while placing greater scrutiny on thin affiliate pages with low-value comparison pieces.

For sweepstakes affiliates, this creates a double exposure. Apart from regulatory contraction, they now also need to tackle algorithmic pressure against the content that appears outdated, commercially unsupported or insufficiently authoritative.

The most effective strategy for 2026 is not choosing between sweepstakes and prediction markets but recognising that these verticals are at very different stages of the lifecycle

The final takeaway 

The most effective strategy for 2026 is not choosing between sweepstakes and prediction markets but recognising that these verticals are at very different stages of the lifecycle.

Sweepstakes content requires defensive management. Affiliates should audit geo-targeted pages, reassess monetisation assumptions and remove claims that imply long-term regulatory stability.

Prediction markets, on the other hand, require offensive investment. Early authority is still attainable, and competition remains relatively limited, with search demand expanding alongside the underlying contract ecosystem.

Most importantly, affiliates should recognise that keyword strategy is no longer purely an SEO exercise. In both sectors, regulatory developments increasingly influence which keywords retain value, what kind of content remains commercially viable and which language frameworks are sustainable over the long run.

The affiliates who adapt their portfolios accordingly will be better positioned for whatever comes next, whether that’s another state-level sweepstakes ban or a prediction market court ruling.

Milan Novakovic HIREQUARTERS

Milan

Novakovic

Your personal reads